?

Log in

No account? Create an account
#1 Neal Stephenson: Quicksilver - Off in the distance — LiveJournal
browse
my journal
links
May 2016
 

The Bellinghman
Date: 2006-01-02 23:18
Subject: #1 Neal Stephenson: Quicksilver
Security: Public
Tags:books, reviews
Neal Stephenson: Quicksilver

Paperback 926 pages (October 7, 2004)
Publisher: Arrow
Language: English
ISBN: 0099410680
Category(ies): Fiction (Historical/Fantasy)

This is the first volume of the Baroque Cycle, and I've been after the cycle for quite a while. It probably didn't help that it wasn't shelved with the rest of Stephenson's work - the SF&F shelves, but in the general fiction area. Well, duh, I should have looked there earlier.

This volume is divided into three books, and is mostly concerned with the English and near-European scene between the 1660s and the 1680s. The first and second books follow different stories with different protagonists, with the third then returning to the characters of the first.

Ah, perhaps a better breaking down is in order. OK:

1 - Quicksilver. This starts with our introduction to Daniel Waterhouse, at Cambridge a fellow student of Isaac Newton, aide and friend thereto, from a Puritan family, learning to keep his head down during the English Restoration. Daniel is a Natural Philosopher, becoming a courtier among the anti-Cromwellian court, the acceptable face of the strong Protestant tendencies. This book also contains a framing story, concerned with his return from Boston, Mass. to England in 1713, with a whole fleet of pirates attempting to stop him. Otherwise, this is understandably mostly set in Cambridge and London. In general, 1661- 1673

2 - King of the Vagabonds. We now have a complete switch of characters, skipping forward a decade to when Jack Shaftoe, a shifty ne'er-do-well gets involved in the raising of the Siege of Vienna. In pursuing loot, he manages to gain a sword, a fine horse and, somewhat disconcertingly, a harem slave, Eliza, from the Turkish camp. Oh, and some silk and ostrich feathers. Off they decide to set for Amsterdam, to sell the loot (well, not Eliza - she turns out to be the brains). With Europe a mess of small wars, many due to the Turks (though they are now being expelled) and many to the Protestant/Catholic struggles, the journey is a long one, and full of incident. Instead of Newton, we have Liebniz.1683-1685

3 - Odalisque. This brings us back to Daniel, but we're now been entwined with Eliza, who is becoming quite a force in the Amsterdam markets, and the court of Versailles. Meanwhile, though we've lost sight of Jack, his elder brother Bob does appear. We see the fall of James II and the arrival of William and Mary to displace him.1685-1689

On the way, there is much discussion of science, mathematics, alchemy, cryptography, economics (Eliza has some interesting schemes to use stock market upsets to make economic war), the family trees of the European royal families (more like a hedge, all intertwined as they are), and of course politics.

It's very strongly grounded in history, but there is a little bit of a fantastical nature on occasion - Eliza apparently comes from the Isle of Qwlghm, which would possibly be Man if Man wasn't, well, Man. And of course, he's played a few liberties with history. But there isn't any magic, no spells, no strange beasts (except during Walpurgisnacht in the Hartz mountains and we know Jack to be drugged out of his mind at that point). So when I mark it as Fantasy, it's mostly because Stephenson writes with a science-fictional awareness of the possibilities, of change, of the importance of ideas, that most novelists would not.

One thing that did annoy me - at the start of volume 2,there is a quote from a review in Starburst that said those that compared this to Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow were being lazy, only then to compare it to Tolkein. No, it's nothing like LotR, you idiot. It's like GR in the depth, the circuitousness of story, the frankly almost overbearing detail, and the anti-hero nature of the protagonists. Oh, and the realistic earthiness of the descriptions. One *bitch-slap* for that Starburst reviewer who presumably always compares big fat trilogies with LotR.

In general - very strongly recommended.
Post A Comment | 2 Comments | | Link



Perdita
User: perdita_fysh
Date: 2006-01-03 13:58 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
I read the second book in the trilogy first (without realising it was a trilogy) and then read the first while in Canada and I'm part way through the third now so it will form my #1 for 2006 when I finally finish it.

I like having these books on the go, they last me a long time with the 20 minutes on the train here and 10 minutes in bed there that I get to read them in. It feels like looking in on another, interesting, world and when I've not got one of these Baroque books on the go I feel a little bereft. So I'm not rushing this last one.

I am, however, suffering from the 'Shardik' effect in that I can't remember much about the first two anymore because so many words have passed under the bridge since them!
Reply | Thread | Link



The Bellinghman
User: bellinghman
Date: 2006-01-04 21:55 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Indeed - doing the review, I had to refer to the text to check which bits happened in which book. Not a bad idea, perhaps, but nearly a thousand pages is a lot to keep straight.

And I'm so glad I knew there were three, and bought them together, and am reading them in the right order.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link