The Bellinghman (bellinghman) wrote,
The Bellinghman
bellinghman

Eady slapped down

Simon Singh wins appeal:

However, the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger and Lord Justice Sedley ruled High Court judge Mr Justice Eady had "erred in his approach" last May, and allowed Dr Singh's appeal.

(It's a shame that Eady can't be dismissed along with his original judgement.)

Also in the Guardian, where it is quoted:

Ruling that Mr Justice Eady had erred in his approach, Lord Judge said the court adopted what Judge Easterbrook, now chief judge of the US seventh circuit court of appeals, had said in a 1994 libel action over a scientific controversy.

Easterbrook had declared that those claiming they had been libelled "cannot, by simply filing suit and crying 'character assassination!', silence those who hold divergent views, no matter how adverse those views may be to plaintiffs' interests.

"Scientific controversies must be settled by the methods of science rather than by the methods of litigation. More papers, more discussion, better data, and more satisfactory models – not larger awards of damages – mark the path towards superior understanding of the world around us."
Subscribe

  • Oh bless

    "The fire ... prompted fire crews to storm the premises shortly after 1am and evacuate a mountain of clubbers out onto the streets." Yes, there was…

  • Automated scrapers getting it amusingly wrong

    I've got a subscription to Bandsintown, which attempts to notify its users when artists on their play lists are giving concerts within their area.…

  • More photographic problems

    In my last post, I noted that I managed to recover from a jammed mirror on the DSLR. What I'd not done was to properly try out the lens after the…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments